Using the General Equilibrium Growth Model to Study Great Depressions: A Reply to Temin Pubblico Deposited

Alpha creator Series Issue number
  • 418
Description
  • In 2008, Peter Temin wrote a review of the book that appeared in the Journal of Economic Literature. This staff report and accompanying data file are in response to the review.

    Citation for review: Temin, Peter. 2008. "Real Business Cycle Views of the Great Depression and Recent Events: A Review of Timothy J. Kehoe and Edward C. Prescott's Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century." Journal of Economic Literature, 46 (3): 669-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.669

Abstract
  • Three of the arguments made by Temin (2008) in his review of Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century are demonstrably wrong: that the treatment of the data in the volume is cursory; that the definition of great depressions is too general and, in particular, groups slow growth experiences in Latin America in the 1980s with far more severe great depressions in Europe in the 1930s; and that the book is an advertisement for the real business cycle methodology. Without these three arguments — which are the results of obvious conceptual and arithmetical errors, including copying the wrong column of data from a source — his review says little more than that he does not think it appropriate to apply our dynamic general equilibrium methodology to the study of great depressions, and he does not like the conclusion that we draw: that a successful model of a great depression needs to be able to account for the effects of government policy on productivity.
Date created
  • 2008-12
Date modified
  • 11/05/2018
Publisher
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Department.
Resource type

Le relazioni

In Collection:
Ultima modifica

Contenuto scaricabile

Scarica il pdf

Zipped Files

Download a zip file that contains all the files in this work.

Elementi