Creator

• Wallace, Neil

Series

• Quarterly review (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Department)

Issue number

• Vol. 22, No. 1

Date created

• 1998 Winter

Abstract

• This essay argues that monetary theories should not contain an undefined object labeled money. Among existing theories that do not satisfy that dictum are models which assume that real balances are arguments of utility or production functions and models which assume cash-in-advance constraints. A main weakness of theories that do not satisfy the dictum is that they cannot address questions about which objects constitute money. Theories that do satisfy the dictum are those which specify assets by their physical properties and which permit the assets’ role in exchange to be endogenous. The essay briefly describes one such theory, a random matching model with assets that differ according to whether they throw off real dividends.

Related information

• This essay is reprinted, with permission, from the book Foundations of Research in Economics: How Do Economists Do Economics? edited by Steven Medema and Warren Samuels, pp. 248-59 (Chapter 21), Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996. © Steven G. Medema and Warren J. Samuels 1996.

Corporate Author

• Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Department

Publisher

• Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Resource type

• Article

DOI

•  https://doi.org/10.21034/qr.2212

In Collection:

• Quarterly Review

Zipped Files

Download a zip file that contains all the files in this work.

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Visibility	Actions
	qr2212.pdf	2019-12-12	Public	Download