||Smith, Bruce D., d. 2002.
||Working paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Dept.)
||Current approaches to monetary theory and policy owe much to the "quantity theory of money." However, recent theoretical developments suggest that the manner in which money is introduced is more important, even for price level movements, than the quantity of money. Colonial American experience provides a laboratory for discriminating between these views. It is shown here that the nature of backing, rather than the quantity of money, determined its value. Large secular inflations were ended by changing the nature of backing despite the continuance of large note issues (and despite the absence of a metallic standard). Extremely large note issues and note withdrawals are shown not to have produced inflation (currency depreciation) or deflation (currency appreciation).
||Quantity theory, Colonial America, Currency, and Fiat money
||E42 - Money and interest rates - Monetary systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the monetary system ; Payment systems, E52 - Monetary policy, central banking, and the supply of money and credit - Monetary policy, and N11 - Macroeconomics and monetary economics ; Growth and fluctuations - United States ; Canada : Pre-1913